 |
 Mark
Fussell & Stuart Dike |
|
Does Myth Mask Communication?
A bit of
background to start.
It’s not
inherent in the human condition for groups to
perform great acts without the need for
recognition. OK, I will concede there are
philanthropic individuals who would wish to
remain anonymous but undisciplined groups as a
rule behave differently. You can’t rely on
confidentiality outside of a military or
professional context…individuals tend to break
cover due to personal need of glory and ego.
The super-human calibre of intellect
required to perform such consistently brilliant
technically- sound works of art, logic would
suggest, would not waste their time for zero
secondary gain. Besides, it’s proven impossible
for Man to replicate anomalistic features in
CC’s…that’s not my point though. Generally
speaking, Mans’ nature needs recognition praise
and encouragement to thrive. We live in a praise
oriented society of celebrity and status…these
are the people we most adore and aspire to
generally speaking. This is just the way folks
are wired right now.
In my
experience, the negative contingent tend to be
of an attention-seeking mentality so would
probably be incapable of keeping quiet. Broadly
speaking, those few individuals that infer their
involvement but never directly admit it and are
often cited by many as possible candidates for
Circle making, just don’t have the means,
knowledge or practical mastery to perform such
acts consistently, year after year on a global
basis without getting thrown in jail or worse!.
(even in Iran now I see!) This whole man-made
hypotheses is quite simply preposterous. I
suggest they are just a myth hyped up by
the media. ‘The Team from Belgium’…ho, ho,
ho…that was a good one. ‘They’ didn’t exist…yet
apparently these mythical beings where
responsible for breath-taking accomplishment a
couple of years back. Yet groups like this seem
to remain a recurring theme in Circle-
Community consciousness. I see absolutely no
evidence whatsoever for this hypothesis. The
myth is a way out. If we don’t feel comfortable
with a particular CC, myth serves a purpose.
So now, on to
the point.
I talk
specifically about the ‘Wormhole’ CC in July of
this year largely regarded as a ‘fake’. For most
people the Cherhill Peacepipe Alien CC of last
year was also just too much. Written off as a
joke and given little further attention. Good
fun but that’s all. But now consider this… the
‘Wormhole’ at Boreham Wood. Take away the comic
face and what do we have? Perfect geometry in an
undulating landscape (variants need compensation
on the ground), wonderfully well executed design
and the tell-tale hallmarks of a mysterious
event that went largely unrecognised (or
ignored). Sub-lay features were undeniable in
the face ( I took witnessed photo after
discovery.) So the problem with this CC was the
childlike face of a smiling ‘ caterpillar’. I
actually didn’t see it as a caterpillar at all,
moreover staged or layered levels of emerging
communication from another dimension perhaps
(the wormhole) ending with the face, a light
hearted, infantile, non- threatening token of
goodwill.
With the Peacepipe
Alien of last year, the same thing …looked comic
but more importantly an evolving form of
communication ( of which I wrote in more detail
in a previous Spiral edition.) Social pressure
came to bear as folks were influenced by cries
of “fake, fake, done by boarders”…the judgement
was made…people felt safe, could explain it now
and move on. The problem with this one though
was that based on the evidence on the ground and
cross referencing features and trends to
countless other CC’s worldwide that were widely
considered mysterious by serious observers,
this CC had an appearance of faultless
construction, outstanding qualities and
recurring themes . In other words if this was
‘fake’ so were most of the others, which is just
no longer a realistic option.
In my view, this
development in communication is huge but it also
demonstrates a clear irony. As the governments
and institutions of the world spend tens of
millions on radio telescopes and the like in an
attempt to make contact with ‘E.T’. they don’t
seem to realise it’s right there under their
very noses…CC communication. Or perhaps I’m
wrong, maybe it is all an elaborate
smokescreen…the establishment contriving a sense
of control where-on they can announce…”nothing
detected as yet”. Perhaps we, the interested
minority in CC activity don’t always recognise
it either when presented in such a novel form as
this…it has to be man-made doesn’t it?…it’s
just not geometry!
I feel we really do
need to keep apace of events, to be mindful of
new forms of communication using a
non-judgemental openness that we all profess to
nurture but perhaps not always practice.
Happy Circling!
Paul Jacobs.
|