Andrews, Crop Circle Culprit, Strikes Again"
From: "Colin Andrews"
To: Colin Andrews
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 9:27 AM
Subject: Yahoo! WebHosting Email
name = Megan
email = megan
phone = Australia
comments = Dear Colin,
I have been watching the crop circle phenomenon unfolding with great
interest for the last 12 years, and I am well aware of the early
research carried out by yourself, Pat Delgado, Terence Meaden and Busty
Taylor. I have tremendous respect for all who are committing their
lives, energies and resources to uncovering the truths behind what is a
very complex multidisciplinary phenomenon. People from incredibly
diverse backgrounds have given valuable insights to which we owe a great
debt of gratitude. Also they do not require a PhD to deserve our
attention and respect.
It is my estimation that the most valuable contribution comes from the
scientific evidence. BLT Research Team has been carrying out impeccable
science, publicising their process and demonstrating consistent,
repeatable findings in their plant and soil analysis. Their findings
have been peer reviewed. I was deeply shocked to read your attack
firstly on Levengood, stating that he is not credentialed enough??? He
is after all a plant biophysicist. How much more credentialed does one
need to be? BLT Reseach has had many very highly qualified scientists
carrying out specialised examinations.....all whom are listed on the BLT
site for their contributions. When I read your defamatory statements
which are so ill-founded and supported only with malice, I thought to
myself that you do not realise the damage you are doing to yourself. It
is plain to me, as it would be to anyone who is familiar with the BLT
material, that you are not familiar with the science which has been so
well documented as scientific process requires.
Nancy has been just as transparent and scientific in her approach with
the extraordinary abilities of Robbert Van der Broeke. Nancy has
painstakingly recorded every aspect and observation she has made in the
presence of Robbert, recording every detail about the cameras used and
has ensured that other witnesses have accompanied them both into the
crop fields etc. Further to that Nancy had sought the assistance of Dr
Rolls as well.
Colin, who do you have assisting you in your assertions? ....A
Colin, without stating how you would come to such conclusions about
Robbert`s abilities you have defamed him in a vicious manner totally
unworthy of you. I have listened to your interview on Red Ice Creations,
and I thought you were a person who had some wisdom and understanding of
paranormal phenomena. However the way you have attacked Robbert not only
as a medium but also as a person is ugly in the extreme.
I visited the link you provided on your web site to see what the
circumstances were around the contact with Pat Delgado. To be honest if
I were a grieving friend and especially a grieving relative I would be
incredibly uplifted, as most are to know of such contact and especially
to receive a message. To take such offence is hardly honouring the
memory of a dear departed friend. Such outrage clearly indicates a total
denial of our spiritual essence. With respect Colin, I feel that Pats
message would be well worth heading yourself. Look at it again. Look at
I am really sorry to see that you are not the person I thought you to
be. How I wish that all persons who are plainly seeking the truth are
supported by their allies.
BELOW IS MY RESPONSE TO COLINS REPLY WITH COMMENTS ON WHAT HE
SAYS IN ITALICS.
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 07:04:27 -0700
Subject: RE: Colin Andrews reply
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 21:34:20 +1000
I am grateful that you replied my mail so soon, and if I may I would
like to pursue further your response.
I have always admired your research and especially in the early years of
the pioneering research. You heroically continued pushing and standing
for the truth to prevail against many attacks, shenanigans by the media,
military and the public. You have known what it's like to be deceived,
conned, manipulated, ridiculed and humiliated. I have collected many
articles and TV shows for instance which featured yourself with Pat and
George Wingfield pitted against Doug and Dave, and I believe there was
very nearly fisty cuffs in the back room. The reason I am saying this is
that there are enough battles to fight with detractors. Why are we
fighting with our allies who are also on the same team? I do not
understand this. It reminds me of a classic scene in "Life of Brian"
when Brian says to his fellow brothers in arms.... "Wait, wait.....we
should all be struggling together"
"But We are. We are!" scream the fellow brothers in arms who meet and
start clashing with each other in underground tunnels. "No! Not with
each other......" Yells Brian "With the common enemy!" By that time
practically all of them are lying dead on the ground.
Below in italics are my responses with respect and best intention.
Subject: Colin Andrews reply
Thank you for your message Megan,
I'm afraid you do seemed to have jumped
through a great deal of facts without realizing that I am not making any
allegations just stating facts and I am not a person who hold malice.
By what you have just said, are
you then "stating as fact" that you do acknowledge that Robbert`s
visions of when and where crop circles are going to appear have come
about, but that they are highly reminiscent of many hoaxes you have seen
over the years? Is this a fact that they are hoaxes? Are you suggesting
that perhaps he has hoaxed them? What evidence do you have to support
this claim? If one cannot publish any evidence to support such a
defamation then you are actually being malicious. These statements are
after all going out into the public arena.
The statement I have posted is from the
Delgado family but you are aiming your shots and comments to me. I have
acted to support the family of my long time friend Pat Delgado. The
statement is theirs and I support and agree with it.
Obviously you support and agree
with the statements of Pat Delgado's family. You have published them to
attack the BLT Team publicly. Because you published them and support
them it is appropriate for me to direct my comments to you. I understand
yours and their sense of loss and bereavement, but I do not understand
such offence and outrage for the message imparted. Are you stating fact
again when you say that it's "trickery"? What evidence do you have for
this statement? This statement which you believe is not malicious?
All other statements on the page are as a result of hands on work
myself, alongside numerous highly qualified Scientists. I don't intend
fighting any corners here. I have numerous files and research findings
that fully support each statement made. By the way I didn't say he was
not qualified enough. The point is that he originally presented himself
as Dr. W.C. Levengood while in fact he is not a doctor - that's all.
The evidence is in abundance on all other points. This is very old
ground for me and I do agree its sad. The work though goes on. There is
only one goal set on my radar - Truth with respect. If the spirit of Pat
is coming through Robbert and with messages, his family and I are quite
sure he would want them conveyed to them. This is a case of ethics or
the lack of them on the part of Nancy and Robbert.
I can understand how a personal approach to Pat`s family about such
contact would have been a sensitive move on the part of Nancy and
Robbert, but surely not obligatory given that so many are coming through
with Robbert. Who are we to dictate what the scope of his work should
entail? To expect that he contacts family of all that he encounters? but
in the case of such extreme reaction and disbelief of his abilities it
is obvious albeit in hindsight that such a gesture would not be well
received. I certainly do not believe that it shows a lack of ethics.
I also believe that Truth with respect are uppermost in the
intentions of Nancy and Robbert. What has been flung at them are
inflammatory and emotive remarks and labels - trickery, disgrace,
unscientific extreme, professional magicians, appalled, outrageous,
despicable, unacceptable. It sounds like they should go before the
firing squad! Who is the dispenser of ethics?
Thank you for listening to me and for responding.
Have a good weekend.
BELOW IS THE FINAL LETTER TO COLIN WHICH WENT UNANSWERED.
I realise you are a busy person so I apologise for taking up your time
again, only to briefly say that I don`t presume to know everything that
goes on between researchers. I have not been able to escape hearing
though about what amounts to total massacres of the characters of one
researcher against another and I find it shocking but it shouldn`t come
as any surprise, because this is how our Government’s govern and how
countries fight each other with deliberate subterfuge and propaganda to
inflame egos. It is not how to build a new world.
I do not want to have any of that stuff polluting the scope on the
intelligence behind the crop circles and all the paranormal phenomena
You need to know this.
I wouldn't have known about your posting about the BLT research team at
all if it hadn't been for a person who has heard me talking about crop
circles to whom I referred to the work of early researchers and to the
science which has been peer reviewed on plants and soil analysis. This
person was a sceptic and a debunker and with a flurry of self
righteousness sent me your posting as proof that the whole phenomenon
was a farce, particularly all the paranormal aspects.
No matter who's throwing the daggers, I say "Cut it out!"
People such as yourself and Nancy and Robbert and all others in fact
have valuable pieces of the puzzle. Anyone who is a researcher of crop
circles knows what he or she is up against to stand for their truth and
contribution. But they still make their stand despite all the ridicule
from the media and the public at large, despite deliberate Gov
subterfuge and harassments. You still stood for truth. Why would anyone
bring that onto themselves? Truth gives the courage to do such things.
Because this phenomenon is so multifaceted there are many diverse
relevant aspects converging from many disciplines.
For example - until some geologists and some engineers took a close
look and started questioning official academic stories we carried on
believing that the sphinx was no older than 4,500 yrs.
This is our challenge to come to unity on this. Why should you also
endure the mud slinging and backstabbing from one researcher against
The crop circles are bringing people together from many disciplines and
holding up a mirror to ourselves amongst many other things.
By what you posted about Robberts abilities people could conclude that
you do not believe in such things at all, and that despite the loving
and insightful messages coming forth and exchanged this invokes outrage
to the extent that you even believe that this is a slur on Pats memory
and reputation. I can hear you saying that these are the expressed views
of Pats family. However you support them and you have made them public.
My intention is not to be disrespectful here. What if YOU were wrong on
this? What would that mean in terms of honouring the memory of a
departed friend? More importantly, what would that mean for yourself?
I'm sure you are a person who believes that we are spiritual beings,
that we survive physical death and that spirit mediums exist. Perhaps I
am wrong. Robbert is not a medium that we simply have to take at face
value. Nancy has seen to that. Surely you can see this. I can only
conclude that your outrage and moral indignation cannot come from the
beautiful message imparted, but from ego and puffery about not being
personally alerted beforehand of such contact. Does this warrant the
extreme attacks and defamations made public?