I'd first
like to thank the Crop Circle Connector for allowing me to use the
following adapted [and truncated] version of one of their copyright
images:
Fig 1
This neat
formation, which appeared on day 173 of the year [June 22],
grabbed my attention immediately, for the following two reasons.
The 4sided
figure of the interior [a special form of quadrilateral, often referred
to as a 'kite'] is encompassed by a 1lined figure we call
a circle, so we can say that:

reading from the inside of the formation, out, can
infer the prime 41, which happens to be the prime rank
of 173 [i.e. 173 is the 41^{st} prime
(counting 1 as the 1^{st}, as usual)]^{1}

reading from the outside of it, in, can infer 14,
which is the prime rank of the cited 41
These
relationships are displayed in the symbolic image below:
Fig. 2
Having
observed this clear involvement of primes in the formation's
numerical structure, I couldn't fail to notice that it embodies a subtle
allusion to a number that I almost invariably find in authentic crop
circles [I also encounter links to the number in my analyses of
dreams].
When 1
& 4 are expressed as what I call the corresponding primes
i.e. the 1^{st} prime & the 4^{th} [or in
abbreviated form, 1p & 4p], namely, 1 & 5,
their sum is 6.
And if
this 6 is juxtaposed with 173, which could be carried out
by modifying Fig. 2, we can generate the number 6371, by reading
anticlockwise from the 6, as illustrated below:
Fig. 3
Those who
have read my earlier Crop Circle Connector articles should recall
that 6371 is the geometric mean radius, in kilometres, of
the ellipsoid employed as the WGS 84 earth model. They should
also recall that the dimension is accurate to the nearest metre.
I now
suspected that the formation formed part of the same process I'd first
identified in our season's initial circle: the intriguing edifice that
had appeared at Brimslade Farm on April 16, my investigation of which
had led to the article  Echoes of missing Flight MH370: Part 1
published on this site.
Not only
did the new, authenticlooking structure display, at its centre, a
representation of a simple flying device, a kite, but it was
positioned alongside Southend Airport. So it was tied in two
independent ways to the concept of aeronautics.
But I also
knew that the number 14, which it can define in the way I've
indicated, embodies, in the context of prime numbers, an
unambiguous link to a pivotal feature of Flight MH370: the sum of the
first 14 primes is  239  the exact quota of missing
people. Furthermore, the difference between this 239 and 173, the day
the formation was found, is, 66, which was the day of the year [UTC]
that the aircraft went missing:
Fig. 4
Another
feature of the link between the formation's 14 numerical
configuration and the 239, which represents the quota of missing
people associated with Flight MH370, is that we have grounds for
duplicating it.
As the
reverse of the inferred 14 i.e. 41, is also the 14^{th}
prime, it's clear that viewings of the 14 & 41
configurations can each infer a 14: in the first case we have an
explicit inference of 14 and in the next we can infer 14,
based on our knowledge that it's the prime rank of 41.
This
conclusion was of particular interest to me because I realised that if
we are being invited to produce two lots of the aforementioned 239
[each, as the sum of the first 14 primes], a very interesting
relationship manifests itself.
239
is the 53^{rd} prime and two lots of 53 can infer 106,
a number that was stressed in the cited Brimslade Farm formation. The
date it appeared, April 16, was day 106 of the year:
Fig. 5
It seemed
possible, then, that our attention was being drawn, here, to the first
formation of the UK season  the very one whose contents had triggered
my article on the MH370 mystery!
I
therefore sought to establish if any other meaningful links exist
between this particular pair of structures  and I soon found an
exceedingly impressive one.
Having
discovered, years ago, that large distances between points in formations
have to be measured on a specific model of the earth [which I've alluded
to many times in my articles]  namely, a sphere of radius
6371 km [which is linked to the wellknown WGS 84 parameters]  I
wasted no time in computing the precise distance between the two crop
circles.
Although I
hadn't surveyed this Temple Farm formation [or its predecessor] and had
failed to acquire, from other sources, confirmed coordinates of any
points in its interior, I was able to obtain a good estimate of this
information by comparing photographs, provided on this site, with
Google earth imagery. I concluded that the rounded
coordinates, 51.567° N 0.7145° E, define a point that sits
within the field edifice. It is shown on the Google earth image
below:
Fig. 6
Knowing
that the number 14 has a pivotal role in this structure, I
recognised the possibility that it would be incorporated, in some way,
into the measurement I obtained. And as it's the case that the factor
105 is the sum of the first 14 positive integers [=
1+2+…+13+14], I knew that it would be an ideal candidate for this
function.
But as I'd
identified the means of generating, within the formation, the
allimportant geodetic factor, 6371, I thought it was plausible
that this number, or a simple proportion of it, would also be a
component of the dimension.
It didn't
surprise me, then, when I found that the distance between the point I
had identified at the Brimslade Farm formation [which is detailed in my
article], 51.376° N 1.702° W, and the above point can be
expressed as [105 + 63.71] km, with an error of less than
2¼ inches^{2}.
Although I
knew that the Temple Farm coordinates I'd used, 51.567° N 0.7145° E,
were just estimates, I was now confident that an arc, of radius
168.71 km exactly, centred on the quoted Brimslade Farm
point, intersects the crop circle.
The
following graphic illustrates the extent of the line between the two
points, where it can be seen traversing a massive swathe of the south of
England, including the whole of London [just clipping Heathrow
Airport]:
Fig. 7
When I
examined this arrangement more closely, I noted that the depicted
radius, 168.71 km, correlates in an extraordinary way with other
explicit features of the two formations.
If the day
the 1^{st} crop circle appeared is labelled Day 1, and
that of the 2^{nd} is labelled Day 68 [i.e. the
number of calendar days in this interval is 68 (= 173106+1)], we
have immediately highlighted 2 numbers that display the first
three digits [in order] of the cited dimension: 168.
But if we
look back from the edifice where our measurement ended, the 2^{nd}
formation, to the one where it started, the 1^{st}, we
can infer, 21, which happens to be the prime rank of 71.
And we
know that the juxtaposition of 168 and 71 can infer,
168.71, the cited value [in km] of the computed dimension.
Furthermore, the sum of the inferred 168 & 71, provides us
with another manifestation of the pivotal MH370 parameter, 239,
its allotment of missing people.
These
elementary but remarkable relationships are illustrated in the symbolic
image below:
Fig. 8
I now
noted that the inferred 168, which was juxtaposed with the 71 to define
the value of the depicted dimension, can be expressed as, 97+71,
these being, in order, the 26^{th} & 21^{st}
primes. So if we now express the described '168+71' as,
26p+21p+21p, the sum of these three prime ranks
is, 68 [= 26+21+21], which equals the tally of calendar days in
the period.
I later
discovered that another close association between the numbers 68
& 3 holds the key to our understanding of a critically important
part of the communication.
I was now
satisfied, then, that our attention was being drawn  in a stunning way
 to both the geodetic relationship that exists between these formations
and, its link to the MH370 enigma. However, it was not immediately
obvious where our recognition of these important attributes is taking
us.
Before I
contemplated trying to resolve this particular conundrum I thought that
it would be a worthwhile exercise investigating whether the factor
100  used to convert 6371 to the 63.71  is inferred
within the formation, and another glance at an earlier graphic provided
the answer.
It was now
apparent that if the 4 faces of the kite [or its 4 vertices] are
numbered  1, 2, 3 & 4  the sum of those
labels is: 10. But as this inferred 10 is closely
associated with a figure that resembles a zero, the O that
encompasses the kite, the combined image can infer, 100:
Fig. 9
Having
concluded that this hidden '100' provides the means for
converting the 6371 to 63.71, I recognised that it could
also be used to inflate the number I'd identified [expressed in
km] by 100 fold i.e. if we multiply the 168.71 by 100,
we obtain 16871, which would represent the same dimension but in
increments of '10 metres' instead of '1000 metres' [i.e.
kilometres].
This
simple exercise immediately drew my attention to the 5digit number 
and I soon found that it's the 1946^{th} prime^{3}.
This interested me because, in our calendar, 1946 defines a
specific year, one which happens to be 68 years ago, and I knew
that a 68 plays a central role, again in the context of time,
in the relationship I'd detected between the two formations.
I was
presented with the possibility, then, that our attention was being drawn
to the 68 days of the calendar that are associated with the two
crop circles, and so I sought to establish why.
When I
inserted, within a modified form of the earlier Fig. 8, a reference to
this 68, I recalled the link I'd found between the number and a
3 [outlined in the paragraph after Fig, 8] and this soon
led me to another relationship of extraordinary significance.
Having
retained the two labels for the formations, 1 & 2, I noted
that the product of 3 [= 1+2] and 331, the 68^{th}
prime, is  993  and this relates to the above cited number,
16871, in a way that could have a profound impact on the
international search for Malaysian Flight MH370.
16871
exceeds 993p [= 7853] by  9018  and when this is divided
by the factor 100, which we know is highlighted in the Temple
Farm edifice, we produce  90.18  which is the exact value [in °
E] of the meridian through the point I've identified in the Bay of
Bengal:
Fig. 10
Furthermore, the actual time span between the respective
appearances of the two formations is 67 days, and 67
happens to be the 20^{th} prime  20 being the
exact value [in ° N] of the line of latitude through the point I've
identified in the northern reaches of the Bay of Bengal:
Fig. 11
So it is
clear that the values [in °] of both the latitude and longitude of the
point I've identified in the Bay of Bengal are embodied within the
arrangement we've been examining. Indeed, it's not difficult to show
that another pair of the same numbers can be derived from the source in
an impressive and independent way, as I briefly outline in my Notes^{4}.
At this
juncture, having noticed that the numbers representing the coordinates
of the point in the Bay of Bengal  20 and 90.18 
comprise digits that also add up to 20, I was curious as to
whether the number conceals anything else of interest.
I knew
that when 20 is set out as the product of its prime factors,
2x2x5, this can be modified in 2 ways that maintain
its value  4x5 or 2x10  and I discovered
that these expressions relate in a revealing way to the number 173,
which represents the day of the year when the making of the two
structures ended, this being 20p [= 67] days after it had
commenced.
4px5p,
equals 35 [= 5x7]. And 173  35 = 138, which
can be inferred by juxtaposing 13 & 8.
But
juxtaposing our alphabet's 13^{th} & 8^{th}
letters yields a familiar expression:
MH.
2px10p
yields, 46 [= 2x23], a special number for our species: our cells'
tally of chromosomes [also as 2 lots of 23]. So if we express this
unique number as another prime, we obtain: 197.
When this
197 is now added to the 173, we obtain a second
familiar expression: 370.
So
elementary links between 173 and the cited factors of
20 can infer both components of the expression
MH370, the wellknown name of the
Malaysian Airway's Flight.
Final
comments
The
attributes of the Temple Farm formation that I've set out, here,
including its remarkable links to the UK season's first crop circle, are
there for everybody to see and, check. It would therefore be absurd for
anyone to suggest that I somehow managed to conjure them all up to
support my earlier conclusions regarding the possible resting place of
Flight MH370. Indeed, I'm currently in the process of finalising further
articles on this year's crop circles that present another array of
evidence backing the hypothesis.
It's my
contention, then, that the international authorities burdened with the
task of seeking the wreckage should now acknowledge that the claims,
concerning the Bay of Bengal site, first made by the company
GeoResonance, may have substance. I would add, finally, that a
critical hint at what the Temple Farm formation is all about was exposed
by Mike Collins and
Bella Gaia:
after visiting the structure they both reported that the one end of it
was orientated towards Southend Airport's radar facility  which is
used, of course, for tracking aircraft!
Notes
1
Although
primes are readily available on line, or in Mobile apps, they all start
at 2 and not 1. So what is claimed to be the N^{th}
prime will actually be the N+1^{th}  see Note 3 below.
2
This
precision is possible because the measurement, on the surface of the
defined model of the earth, is being made between specified geographical
coordinates. As I've stated before, such calculations can be easily
undertaken with the assistance of the internet or Mobile apps.
3
Most
sources show the 1946^{th} prime as 16879, but that's the 1947^{th}.
The 1946^{th} is 16871.
4
The sum of
the calendar days' 68 numbers, [(106+173)x34], can be expressed
as: 1633+7853.
1633
can be expressed as 10px21p, which can infer 210,
the sum of the first 20 +^{ve} integers.
And we
know that 7853 differs from 16871 by, 9018, which
equals 90.18x100.
So that
one, specific set of 68 calendar days juxtaposes
irrefutable links to both 20 and 90.18.
© Neil Hudson Newman MSc. [Construction Management]; 02 July, 2014