My work on the Westwoods
structure. © Neil Hudson Newman 22.07.08
On Saturday I
partly surveyed the Westwoods crop formation, assisted by David
Glanville, and my findings are as follows . ...
Note: my
tripod-mounted laser device reads to the nearest millimetre [its
likely error range being ±
1.5 mm] but I've
rounded the results to the nearest centimetre [which is a more
realistic unit for measurements within a crop].
The diameter of
the structure's central circle [of flattened crop] and the
measured geographical coordinates [as per WGS 84] of its centre
[the position of which was determined on site] are shown on the
Fig.:-
Below I've
depicted the dimensions [in metres] from the centre point [the
red dot] to the formation's 4 pointed tips, where the 'Northern
tip' is the one located nearest the woods [the reference to the
Cardinal points is for labelling purposes only]:-
Preliminary comments and
analysis
The northern arm is the longest
[59.06 metres] and the remaining dimensions [55.10 m; 54.99 m &
53.85 m] can be seen to decrease from this, progressively, in an
anticlockwise direction [as viewed].
Although the four distances exhibit
this dimensional consistency i.e. they decrease in the cited
order, the respective values otherwise appear to be erratic.
However, their sum [= (59.06 + 55.10 + 54.99 + 53.85) m]
interested me:-
223 metres
In my first analysis of a crop
formation - Milk Hill, 2001 - I concluded that a significant
part of its intended communication was expressed through the
language of prime numbers [www.milkhill-revealed.com]
and I knew that 223 is such a prime ... the 49th, when 1 is
counted as the first prime [as it should be]. A list of the
first 700 primes is attached.
Furthermore at Milk Hill I
discovered that its reported day of creation - when expressed in
accordance with the calendar employed in the land it occurred
within - was inextricably linked, in a number of ways, to the
formation's unique structural arrangement, and I could now see
that the Westwoods edifice exhibits similar relationships
[although their actual forms are, not surprisingly, different to
those encountered at Milk Hill]. ...
The above quoted Westwoods'
dimension, 223 metres, had been obtained by adding four key
measurements, each of which had been rounded to the nearest
centimetre [= 0.01 metres]. But these measurements defined the
respective displacements of the structure's four conspicuous
extremities from the centre of its central circle, and when the
diameter of that central circle, 9.9 metres, is expressed in
centimetres its numerical value, 990, relates in a revealing way
to the cited 223. ...
223 + 990 = 1213, the 199th
prime
the structure having been first
reported on the year's 199th day [= July 17]
More subtle links to '199' can also
be identified when we consider that, within the formation, 16
smaller circles [= 4x3 + 4] of flattened crop encompass the
described central circle. Note: the central circle is also
encompassed by a ring of flattened crop [from which
each arm radiates] but a ring is of a different form.
...
Firstly, the 16th prime is ...
47 ... and 199 happens to be the 47th
prime.
But if the 16 outer circles are
considered to represent the first 16 primes [which can be
abbreviated to: 1p, 2p, 3p, 4p, 5p, 6p, 7p, 8p, 9p, 10p, 11p,
12p, 13p, 14p, 15p, 16p] their sum is:-
329 [=
1+2+3+5+7+11+13+17+19+23+29+31+37+41+43+47]
- and this 329 relates to 990, the
diameter of the encompassed central circle [expressed in cms],
in an illuminating way:-
329p - 990 = 199p
[i.e. 2203 - 990 = 1213]
It's even the case that if the
cited 16 [the tally of outer circles] is now juxtaposed
with the 1 [the solitary central circle] we can infer
161, which is another edifying number:-
990 - 161p [= 941] = 49
the sum of the formation's 4 arm
measurements, in metres, being [as we know] ... 49p
[= 223]
I would suggest, then, that our
identification of the foregoing relationships appears to be
confirming that, as was the case at Milk Hill [2001], the
builders of this particular crop structure are communicating in
prime numbers, using, on this occasion, the metric system of
distance measurement [which I can prove is infinitely older than
the French would have us believe] to set out part of the data
they are inviting us to inspect.
It may also be relevant that one of
the primes that has a prominent role in today's analysis is the
47th [= 199] - because the nearby Hillside Farm
formation also appears to be stressing 47 i.e.
two of its four circular arrangements are believed to comprise
47 segments [I have not yet analysed the
arrangement, I'm currently working on the remarkable Uffington
structure].
I would add that [as stated above]
47 is the 16th prime and when 16 is added to the 199th prime [Westwoods
having appeared on day 199] we obtain ... 1229
... which is the 202nd prime, and the Hillside
Farm structure was first reported on the 202nd
day of this year [July 20].
© Neil Hudson Newman 22.07.08
|
